We build it, run it and keep improving it with you.

Yes. Every Multiplier option is sized and priced against what the Map finds, so we're proposing work on your real numbers rather than on a guess.

We propose a few options, each priced against what the Map found your gaps are worth. So you can weigh the cost of each against the value on your own numbers, and choose the one that fits your budget.

No. Our team builds and runs the technical side, the surveys, tests and automations, so your team never touches it. What we need is someone who knows your audience for approvals and context.

Maybe not for everything. Your team can write and build the content, emails and pages. What in-house teams rarely have is the personalization layer and the measurement: the segments, the rules that decide who sees what, and a baseline that shows what actually moved. We can set the strategy, own that part, and direct your team through the rest. It's one of the options we can propose at the end of the Map.

Then we'll tell you. The Multiplier runs on the site you have. If the Map shows the site itself is the constraint, a redesign or rebuild is proposed as its own piece of work alongside it.

Good. We build on the tools you already use and work alongside the people you already have. If you'd rather have one partner than five, we can bring in people we trust and hold it together.

We set a baseline before we build and report against it every quarter, so you can see what moved. We don't promise a specific number, because your supporters' choices aren't ours to guarantee, but we do guarantee the work: see our two guarantees above.

Because the build is only half of it. The Multiplier is two things working as one: a senior strategist who reads your data and sets each quarter's direction, and a team that builds and runs the technical side, the surveys, tests, and automations. The strategy tells the build what to make, and the build feeds back data that sharpens the strategy. To run that loop in-house you'd hire both a strategist and a technical operator for a part-time need, and you'd still only see your own data. We do it for less, and the system keeps improving as it learns from your data, which a one-time build can't do on its own.

Because that's roughly how long the work takes to pay off, not how long it takes to trap you. The first weeks build the system. Over the year the two halves do their job: a strategist sets each quarter's moves, and the technical side keeps building on what your data shows, so the system gets sharper the longer it runs. We start with strategy and your real numbers, so you see the potential before you commit to the year.

It's an operating cost, not a big capital outlay, which fits how a board already budgets for software and agencies. We model it on your specific numbers, list size, giving, what you sell, value per supporter, so you walk in with a plan a board can actually read. Most boards approve a system that pays for itself in recovered giving and sales faster than a one-off campaign that doesn't.

Access to your supporter data and your email platform, your existing copy, offers, and ads, and a few hours a week from someone who knows your audience. Reactivating your existing list also means sending a survey to it, which goes out from you. It's real involvement, not a heavy lift, and we're honest about the difference.

You own the system outright: full documentation, full training, your platform, your data. The first cycle runs twelve months because that's how long the work takes to pay off, not to trap you. At the end of it you review what moved and decide whether to continue. The case for continuing is the same as the case for starting: we're the strategy and technical team you'd otherwise have to hire, for less. If you ever want to take it over yourself, you can.